Christian Perspectives in Science Seminar Archives

Offices and Services / Office of Research & Scholarship / Seminars at Calvin / Christian Perspectives in Science / Archives

This page contains an archived list of past Christian Perspectives in Science presentations, organized by the academic term in which they were presented. If supplementary files—PowerPoint slides, handouts, audio recordings, etc.—are available, they are listed after each abtract.

Entries marked with an asterisk (*) were not part of the CPIS seminar series, but are relevant to the topics covered by the CPIS series.

Fall 2019
September 6, 2019

Title: "Beyond Stewardship: New Approaches to Creation Care"

Presenter: David Warners, Biology Department, Calvin University; Mathew Heun, Engineering Department, Calvin University

Abstract: What if God didn’t place humans on Earth to be stewards of creation but something else? If not stewards, then what? The new book Beyond Stewardship (Calvin Press) aspires to equip Christians to live better in this world by helping us all think more intentionally about the relationship we have with the nonhuman creation in which we are necessarily and thoroughly embedded. It first identifies some conceptual and theological limitations with the term "stewardship." Then, it offers ways to think more carefully about the relationship we have with the nonhuman creation. What characterizes that relationship? Is it healthy or unhealthy; affirming or degrading? What would a reconciled relationship between human beings and the rest of creation look like? Thoughtful answers emerge from chapters written by scholars from diverse disciplines who all share a deep passion for a flourishing creation. Collectively, they offer an expanded and enlivened understanding of the place of humans in the context of God’s creation. In this seminar, editors David Paul Warners (BIOL) and Matthew Kuperus Heun (ENGR) will provide a brief overview of the book and how it came to be. A reception with editors and authors (with refreshments) to follow.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
October 18, 2019

Title: "Sea ice loss and sea level rise"

Presenter: Ralph Stearley, Geology, Geography, and Environmental Studies Department, Calvin University

Abstract: To be announced.

October 25, 2019

Title: "The Urgency of Climate Change Solutions in East Africa"

Presenter: Deanna Geelhoed, Program Coordinator, Plaster Creek Stewards, Biology Department, Calvin University

Abstract: To be announced.

October 18, 2019

Title: "Sea ice loss and sea level rise"

Presenter: Ralph Stearley, Geology, Geography, and Environmental Studies Department, Calvin University

Abstract: To be announced.

November 1, 2019

Title: "The 6 Americas & Religious Talk about the Environment"

Presenter: Kathi Groenendyk, Communication Department, Calvin University

Abstract: In a divisive political culture, environmental policy and environmental action are often considered polarizing: either you are pro-environment or you are not. This presentation covers recent research that reveals the public's reaction is more nuanced than that, and so, too, is the range of Christian responses. From this, we can better understand how we should communicate with others about environmental topics.
Spring 2019
April 26, 2019

Title: "Evolutionary creation and the problem of animal death and suffering before the Fall"

Presenter: Ryan Bebej, Assistant Professor of Biology, Calvin College; Harry Ervin, Calvin College student

Abstract: In recent years, evolutionary creation has become an increasingly popular model for Christians seeking to integrate faith and science. However, this approach, in which evolution is understood as God’s method of creation, raises some difficult theological questions. While much recent focus has been on human origins, original sin, and the Fall, there are other more proximate questions related to the pre-human creation that also deserve attention. If evolution is indeed a God-ordained and God-sustained process, then what are we to make of millions of years of competition, predation, and suffering in the animal world before the advent of humans? Is the Fall still somehow to blame, or can organismal death be considered part of God's good creation? What do such biological processes say about God's character? Where might we be able to see redemption in any of this? This seminar will focus on recent work in the area of evolutionary theodicy, looking specifically at non-human animals and exploring an array of possible ways to address these difficult questions.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
Fall 2018
September 21, 2018

Title: "Science, Faith and the Dialog of Cultures: Islamic Perspectives"

Presenter: Dr. Bruno Guiderdoni, Director of Research at the Institute of Astrophysics of Lyon

Abstract: Dr. Guiderdoni is Director of Research at the Institute of Astrophysics of Lyon, a member of the Center National de la Recherche Scientifique. His main field of research is the formation of galaxies and their evolution. He has published more than 100 articles and has organized several international conferences on these issues. He is director of the Lyon Observatory. He is also one of the leading experts on Islam in France and has published 50 documents on Islamic theology and its mystics. He was in charge of a French television program called “Knowing Islam” (“Connaître l'Islam”) from 1993 to 1999, and is now the director of the Islamic Institute of Advanced Studies (Institut des Hautes Études Islamiques).

September 24, 2018

Title: "Common Ground in Science and Faith: A Theologian and a Scientist in Dialogue"

Presenter: Dr. Richard Mouw, theologian and past president of Fuller Seminary; Dr. Praveen Sethupathy

Abstract: Do science and Christian faith have something to offer to each other and to the world around us? Or are these pursuits locked in separate worlds, achieving an uneasy truce at best? Join us for a thought-provoking evening featuring respected theologian Richard Mouw and Cornell geneticist Praveen Sethupathy. Together they will give a fresh perspective on the possibilities of finding common ground in a renewed dialogue between science and faith.

September 25, 2018

Title: "Augustine’s beginning: transitioning from organism to mechanism and the idea of a natural world"

Presenter: Dr. Stanley P. Rosenberg, Executive Director, SCIO: Scholarship and Christianity in Oxford

Abstract: A key development in the shaping of early modern science was the conceptualization of nature in mechanistic terms rather than treating it as an organism, possessing a structure that was organized and predictable. The change was not so revolutionary, however, as it was an idea that began evolving much earlier and was deeply embedded in the theology of Augustine. In his largest commentary on Genesis, “de Genesi ad litteram,” Augustine decisively set aside the vision of the cosmos that saw all particular phenomena as a result of the particular will of the gods or a God and rejected the enchanted world which dominated Near Eastern, Greek, and Roman cosmologies. A profound revolution in his thought evolved which had major implications for the development of the West and its attitudes towards nature and the natural world (notably shaping early modern sciences and the tradition of thought leading up to the sixteenth- and seventeenth-century developments). The commentary signals a sea change that might be described as a Christianization of the cosmos, as it more thoroughly implemented the doctrine of creatio ex nihilo; it desacralized and demystified nature, making it into a contingent, objective, rational structure subject to coherent and intelligible reason.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
September 28, 2018

Title: "A Critical Appraisal of the Evangelical Pro-Life Movement"

Presenter: Dr. Jonathan Dudley, M.D., Instructor, Molecular Genetic Pathology, Stanford University

Abstract: As evangelicals went to the polls in 2016, many embraced a utilitarian ethic: the end of combating abortion justified the means of elevating an unusually controversial candidate to a position of immense power. This logic results largely from a widespread belief that full moral life begins at conception, but Dudley will argue that belief itself is poorly supported by historic Christianity, the Bible, and modern science. While historic Christianity has featured consistent opposition to abortion, the form of that opposition has varied significantly, with most theologians stating that full moral life begins at some point later than conception. The claim that the Bible teaches life begins at conception, meanwhile, is based on exegesis that was not widespread among Christians until the 1980s. In advocating for their goals, pro-life organizations have made inaccurate claims about medical science and pursued policies that increase the abortion rate. Dudley will conclude by advocating an alternative approach to political engagement that doesn’t require subordinating other convictions, and that has a stronger claim to represent historic Christianity by pursuing anti-abortion policies that are based on scientific evidence.

October 3, 2018

Title: "The Liberal Origins (and Conservative Trajectory) of the Pro-Life Movement: A Political and Theological History of the American Campaign against Abortion"

Presenter: Dr. Daniel Williams, Professor, Department of History, University of West Georgia

Abstract: Today American pro-life organizations are usually strong allies of conservative Republicans, but the movement originated as a liberal human rights cause in the mid-20th century, and many of its early leaders were New Deal Democrats who favored an expanded social welfare state to assist women facing crisis pregnancies. This talk will examine the pro-life movement’s early grounding in Catholic social theology, and will examine why this theology of human dignity found a home in the Democratic Party for several decades. The talk will then examine how the pro-life movement responded to changes in American liberalism in the 1970s that eventually strained the link between Catholic social teaching and the Democratic Party, and it will explain why the movement eventually allied with the Republican Party. Evangelical Protestants played a critical role in the political reorientation of the Catholic-inspired pro-life movement. The talk will examine why evangelicals belatedly joined the pro-life campaign and how their view of abortion and politics differed from those of their Catholic allies. The talk will conclude by examining what this history means for Christian practice today, and what tools the history of Christian theology might offer for approaching the issue of abortion policy in contemporary American politics.

October 4, 2018

Title: "A History of Conflict: Protestantism and the Origins of the ‘Conflict Thesis’"

Presenter: Dr. James Ungureanu, Honorary Fellow, Department of History, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Abstract: The conflict thesis is typically traced to the popular historical narratives of John W. Draper’s “History of Conflict between Religion and Science” (1874) and Andrew D. White’s two-volume “History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom” (1896). I argue, however, that Draper and White, contrary to conventional views, did not posit a conflict between “science and religion.” Rather, they envisioned the conflict as one between conservative and liberal theological traditions. This conflict predated Draper and White. Such narratives of theological conflict appeared in Protestant historiography as early as the sixteenth century, among liberal Anglicans in particular. In time, however, such polemics were transformed from Protestant anti-Catholic sentiment to an intra-Protestant self-critique. Nourished in this religious context, by the mid-nineteenth century narratives of conflict between “science and religion” were largely deployed between contending theological schools of thought. However, these narratives were later appropriated by secularists, freethinkers, and atheists as weapons against all religion. I contend that the origins, development, and popularization of the conflict thesis was one of the many unintended consequences of Protestant thought.

Resources:
- Audio recording
- Slides
October 26, 2018

Title: "Current Neuroscience and the Subject Integration Theory"

Presenter: Eric LaRock, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Oakland University; Affiliate Faculty, Center for Consciousness Science, University of Michigan

Abstract: Current neuroscience seems to be converging upon several properties required for consciousness: (1) that local and global connections are required for integrating information contents, (2) that events in frontal regions are required for accessing and manipulating information contents, (3) that events in the thalamus and proximal structures, including the insula, are required for enabling specific information contents, and (4) that the common mechanism of the aforementioned (1-3) neurobiological properties is the synchronous activations of neurons (see Dehaene 2014; Engel & Fries 2016; Singer 2017). As Patricia Churchland observes: “The linkages, it is thought, may consist in synchrony in the activities of populations of neurons” (2013, p. 247). While neuronal synchrony might be necessary in some important sense (e.g., when it comes to matters of predictive coding), it is not sufficient for consciousness, including its integration. Recent data strongly indicates that when an animal is rendered unconscious by means of anesthesia, neuronal synchrony is not only present but actually shows signs of strengthening (see Bola et al 2017). Further, Semir Zeki suggests that connections between V4 and V5 probably do not exist on grounds of neuroanatomical, lesion-based, neuropsychological, and chronoarchitectonic mapping evidence. There is now widespread agreement (a) that V4 and V5 “have distinct, and characteristic, anatomical inputs, despite the many anatomical opportunities for them to interact” and (b) that a lesion in one of those processing sites “does not invade and disable the perceptual territory of the other,” which underscores the functional autonomy of those processing sites (Zeki 2003, p. 214; Zeki 2015). The neuropsychological evidence has shown (c) that damage to V4 does not impact V5, and vice versa. Perhaps most significantly, it can now be shown (d) that the chronoarchitectonic mapping evidence puts pressure on claims (1) and (4) above: when human subjects are exposed to complex visual scenes, “the time courses of activity in human V4 and V5 are significantly uncorrelated, from which we can infer that there are no direct anatomical links between them.” In fact, the time courses between V4 and V5 (and other visual processing sites) can be as great as 80 milliseconds (Zeki 2003, p. 216; Zeki 2015). In sum, the current evidence reveals an asynchronous relation between processing sites, an observable datum that cuts directly against the purported common neurobiological mechanism of consciousness (LaRock 2018). Zeki ultimately concludes that the only entity that counts as truly unitary is the subject that “sits at the apex” of the processing hierarchy (2003, p. 217; see also Zeki 2015). Unfortunately, Zeki does not develop this suggestion into a testable theory. To bridge this theoretical gulf, I propose a new theory called the Subject Integration Theory (SIT), whereby the subject plays a (top-down) role of integrating information contents across cortices of its brain, and develop the testability of SIT in light of recent advances in neuroanesthesia.

November 9, 2018

Title: "Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: The Scientific Enterprise in a Polanyian Framework"

Presenter: John Hess, Ph.D., Middlesex University

Abstract: I consider here the structure, functions, and purpose of modern natural science within the frame of Michael Polanyi’s theory of tacit knowing (TTK). Since its birth, modern natural science is de facto epistemic authority of the liberal and post-liberal order. Hence, misrepresentation of how science achieves new knowledge distorts science, knowledge in general and falsifies our outlook. I place TTK in an emergent Enlightenment reform tradition which seeks to overcome the epistemic difficulties of modern objectivism and post-modern subjectivism and/or relativism. By reference to actual practice of science, TTK gives a truer understanding of knowing by disclosing the tacit nature of all knowledge. Its triadic structure derives from a thorough consideration of scientific discovery. TTK presupposes the fiduciary, tacit, and social roots of all knowledge but overcomes their constraints by the creative exercise of tacit knowing in the pursuit of truth of which discovery is the realization. TTK re-forges the bond between the independence of thought and the obligation to transcendent reality (or truth) which animates science. Science, in Polanyi’s purview, is the pursuit of truth for its own sake. Hence, science divides: pure science is driven by discovery and the ideal of truth while applied science (or technology) by invention and pragmatic or human ends; TTK focuses on pure science. While TTK re-establishes more adequate grounds for and justification of the scientific enterprise, Polanyi admits its quest does not totally sate the human need for a purpose that bears on eternity. Here, TTK re-opens the door to its religious solution.

Resources:
- Audio recording
November 30, 2018

Title: "Discerning a Christian Approach to AI"

Presenter: Derek Schuurman, Computer Science Department, Calvin College

Abstract: AI techniques employing "deep learning" have recently achieved remarkable strides in tackling difficult problems and spurring applications in many new areas. Responses to these developments have ranged from existential fear to unbridled optimism. These discussions open up a plethora of ethical considerations and ontological questions about what it means to be human. The approach one takes to questions rising in AI is largely shaped by our philosophical presuppositions and our worldview. As Christians who care about God’s world, we must do more than wax eloquently about the issues or critique them from the sidelines. Christians need to actively join this conversation bringing insights from Scripture and from Christian philosophy and theology to inform a responsible approach that contributes to the common good. In particular, as we wrestle with these new developments, we must remember what Scripture teaches about what it means to be human, the meaning of work, and the kind of world God would have us unfold.

Resources:
- Audio recording
- Slides
Spring 2018
March 2, 2018

Title: "Beyond the Free Will Defense: natural evil, theodicy, and sacrificial love"

Presenter: Loren Haarsma, Physics & Astronmy Department, Calvin College

Abstract: Atheists sometimes point to features of the natural world as arguments against Theism (e.g. age and immensity of the universe, hiddenness of divine action, randomness, suffering caused by natural events and moral evil, evolution, the neuroscience of belief). In response, numerous Christians have developed “free will” or “soul-making” accounts. A recent book by Christian Barrigar (“Freedom All the Way Up”, Friesen Press) affirms these accounts but advocates a shift of emphasis, arguing for free will as only a necessary pre-condition for God’s ultimate purpose of creating beings capable of understanding and living in relationships of self-sacrificial love towards each other and God. Self-sacrificial love is especially central to God’s Trinitarian nature and revealed in Christ’s redeeming work. This “agape” account for these features of the world can be appealing to many Christians and powerfully inviting for non-Christians. It also has some implications regarding the subtlety of divine action in the natural world, and the (perhaps) inevitability of human sin, which some Christians might find theologically troubling, and are worth further discussion.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
March 9, 2018

Title: "Growing Faith in the Field of Geology"

Presenter: C. Renee Sparks, GEO Department, Calvin College

Abstract: Field opportunities are abundant in geology: We travel to Montana to teach Big Sky Geology or journey to Hawaii to study volcanoes. We traverse Scotland to study the development of geological sciences within the context of Earth history. These places are awe-inspiring in their landscapes, let alone the tectonic forces, chemical reactions, and time necessary to produce them. How can we help our students use these awe-inspiring experiences to grow in their Christian faith? God is revealing His character through His Good Creation and of course, His character is revealed in Scripture as well. Teaching at Calvin College, we have the privilege of recognizing both and sharing that with our students. In this presentation, we will consider passages in Psalms, Job, Ecclesiastes, and the Gospels to see how Scripture complements what we see manifested in Creation as geology. It is important to recognize that growing in the faith not only occurs because of knowledge and understanding. We will also explore opportunities for growth in the field through purposeful prayer, intentional fellowship around the dinner tables, and reserved time for praise and worship.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
April 6, 2018

Title: "The Challenge of Transhumanism"

Presenter: Paul Harper (Physics), Derek Schuurman (Computer Science), and Jim Bradley (Mathematics, emeritus), Calvin College

Abstract: Transhumanism is a movement that seeks to better human existence by employing various technological enhancements, some of which exist now while some are being sought. Among these are genetic modifications, forms of artificial intelligence, life extension, and brain uploading to computers. This seminar will examine these and other such technologies from a Christian perspective. It will discuss theological aspects as well as ethical and policy issues.

Resources:
- Slides
Fall 2017
October 6, 2017

Title: "The Faith of a Scientist"

Presenter: Henry F. Schaefer III, Graham Perdue Professor of Chemistry and Director of the Center for Computational Chemistry at the University of Georgia

Abstract: Henry F. Schaefer III received his undergraduate and doctoral degrees from MIT and Stanford, respectively, both in Chemical Physics. He served as a professor at University of California, Berkeley, for 18 years. He is currently Graham Perdue Professor of Chemistry and Director of the Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry at the University of Georgia. Thomson-Reuters shows Professor Schaefer to be one of the most highly cited physical scientists in the world. He is the recipient of 30 honorary degrees. Professor Schaefer has also given lectures on the interface between science and the Christian faith at more than 200 universities.

Resources:
- Audio recording
- Slides
October 13, 2017

Title: "Do we really live in a non-deterministic world?"

Presenter: James Bradley, emeritus professor of Mathematics, Calvin College

Abstract: Most of classic Christian theology denied the reality of chance, asserting rather that God controls all that happens. Furthermore, prior to the mid-19th century, scientists generally saw the physical world as deterministic. However, since that time, evolutionary biology and quantum physics have led a shift toward the view that the natural world is non-deterministic. But such a view has been problematic for Christian theology, especially for the Reformed tradition. In this talk, I will attempt to clarify what scientists mean by chance and how that differs from popular views. I will also argue (without using quantum mechanics) that the physical world really is non-deterministic. And I will conclude by engaging in some shameless speculations about why God might have made it that way.

Resources:
- Audio recording
- Slides
October 13, 2017

Title: "Do we really live in a non-deterministic world?"

Presenter: James Bradley, emeritus professor of Mathematics, Calvin College

Abstract: Most of classic Christian theology denied the reality of chance, asserting rather that God controls all that happens. Furthermore, prior to the mid-19th century, scientists generally saw the physical world as deterministic. However, since that time, evolutionary biology and quantum physics have led a shift toward the view that the natural world is non-deterministic. But such a view has been problematic for Christian theology, especially for the Reformed tradition. In this talk, I will attempt to clarify what scientists mean by chance and how that differs from popular views. I will also argue (without using quantum mechanics) that the physical world really is non-deterministic. And I will conclude by engaging in some shameless speculations about why God might have made it that way.

Resources:
- Audio recording
- Slides
October 27, 2017

Title: "Science and Faith: A Global Conversation"

Presenter: Wayne Bornholdt, Director of Acquisitions at the Theological Book Network

Abstract: "There is one question that troubled me when I was in college: can science and faith be brought on the same boat?" -Adrianus Yosia, a student at South East Asia Bible Seminary in Indonesia.
As conversations and interactions between science and faith continue to grow and deepen in the US, there are similar conversations going on in the Majority world involving varying faith traditions and convictions. How are Christians and other people of faith engaging issues of science and religion? What answers do institutions and individuals have for Adrianus and others who are asking these difficult questions? The Theological Book Network has been listening to and observing these conversations and asking questions about how best to address them with the appropriate theological resources. Many important insights have been learned through this exercise. Wayne Bornholdt will share examples of the multiple conversations on science and faith that the Network has had over many years.

Resources:
- Audio recording
December 1, 2017

Title: "Patristics, Genomics, and Finding God in the Cell"

Presenter: Clay Carlson, Associate Professor of Biology, Trinity Christian College

Abstract: Christians who confront what genomic science and evolution are telling us about human origins face the same existential crisis that has disturbed Christians for 2000 years – the veracity of truth learned from studying the world that seems at first to contradict scripture. The Patristics, the ancient Church Fathers who wrote during the first centuries of Christianity, faced similar struggles as they wrestled with their understanding of how the world seemed to function, Platonism, and the claims of scripture. Today we can learn from their examples and, with reverence and humility, interpret genomic science of human origins through the lens of the biblical narrative. Even as we are persuaded to modify dearly held interpretations of scripture, we can be comforted by scientific observations that seem to be letters to make us ponder the invisible things of God.

Resources:
- Audio recording
- Slides
Spring 2017
February 6, 2017

Title: "The Lost World of Adam and Eve"

Presenter: John Walton, Professor of Old Testament, Wheaton College

Abstract: Dr. Walton will evaluate Genesis 2 relative to human origins. Based on a close reading of the Hebrew text and correlation with what is known from the ancient Near East, conclusions will be drawn concerning what the biblical claims are and how they help us navigate the modern conversations between science and faith.

March 10, 2017

Title: "Managing Stormwater for Quantity and Quality"

Presenter: John Walton, Professor of Old Testament, Wheaton College

Abstract: Stormwater pollution is one of the greatest threats to Great Lakes water quality. Bill Byl (Calvin '74) recently retired Kent County Drain Commissioner, will explain the causes and potential solutions to the problem from both a technical and political perspective. He will also identify two projects that affect the Calvin campus and how Calvin students and alumni are contributing to the solutions.

Resources:
- Audio recording
- Slides
April 7, 2017

Title: "You Look Like a Movie: Why science still needs its critics"

Presenter: Matthew Walhout, Professor of Physics and Dean for Research and Scholarship, Calvin College

Abstract: Institutions of modern science have always aimed to serve human wellbeing, and no one can deny that they have delivered countless social goods. But should scientists themselves expect to make decisions about what social goods are and how they should be pursued? During the Cold War era, moral questions were generally considered to be outside the scope of science. Science fiction and noir films of that era explored various frightful human consequences to which amoral science might lead. Now, in the 21st century, we can see that some of the underlying fears were justified. This talk will revisit Cold War science and cinema, in order to suggest why we should expect—and even welcome—a renewed debate about the roles that scientists should play in society.
The presentation is intended to appeal both to STEM students and to general audiences with interests in history, philosophy, political science, sociology, and/or film studies.

Resources:
- Audio recording
- Slides
April 7, 2017

Title: "You Look Like a Movie: Why science still needs its critics"

Presenter: Matthew Walhout, Professor of Physics and Dean for Research and Scholarship, Calvin College

Abstract: Institutions of modern science have always aimed to serve human wellbeing, and no one can deny that they have delivered countless social goods. But should scientists themselves expect to make decisions about what social goods are and how they should be pursued? During the Cold War era, moral questions were generally considered to be outside the scope of science. Science fiction and noir films of that era explored various frightful human consequences to which amoral science might lead. Now, in the 21st century, we can see that some of the underlying fears were justified. This talk will revisit Cold War science and cinema, in order to suggest why we should expect—and even welcome—a renewed debate about the roles that scientists should play in society.
The presentation is intended to appeal both to STEM students and to general audiences with interests in history, philosophy, political science, sociology, and/or film studies.

Resources:
- Audio recording
- Slides
April 28, 2017, 2017

Title: "The remarkable tale of the whale: fossils, DNA, isotopes, and the many facets of cetacean evolution"

Presenter: Ryan Bebej, Biology Department, Calvin College

Abstract: Cetaceans (including modern whales, dolphins, and porpoises) have become one of the most frequently cited examples of macroevolution. The fossil record documenting their transition from terrestrial ancestors has exploded in recent decades, providing a series of transitional fossils that demonstrates how the earliest cetaceans adapted to life in water. But the fossils are only part of the story. Lines of evidence from other fields (including comparative anatomy, development, genetics, biogeography, and stable isotope analysis) provide additional details about the evolution of cetaceans. While these varied disciplines highlight distinct facets of this remarkable transition, together they create a compelling and remarkable case of large-scale evolutionary change.

Resources:
- Audio recording
- Slides
May 5, 2017, 2017

Title: "Thinking About Human Creation Through the Complementary Lenses of Faith and Science"

Presenter: Cara Wall-Scheffler, Biology Department, Seattle Pacific University

Abstract: In this lecture I review some key aspects of the Wesleyan Quadrilateral that complement the scientific method. Then I discuss the human fossil record, beginning with early evidence for bipedalism and continuing through to Homo sapiens.

Resources:
- Audio recording
- Slides
Fall 2016
September 16, 2016

Title: "Primed analytic thought and intrinsic religiosity: The importance of individual characteristics"

Presenter: Julie Yonker, Psychology Department, Calvin College

Abstract: In 2012, Science published a study entitled, “Analytic thinking leads to religious disbelief”. This article was picked up in major media outlets with news stories such as, “Why analytical thinking can destroy your belief in God (even if you are devout)” (Daily Mail, 2012). Several of us researchers in the field of the Cognitive Science of Religion (using theories from the cognitive sciences to understand religious thought and behavior) endeavoured to experimentally re-examine the research published in the Science article. Our results pointed in a different direction; we found that priming analytical thinking resulted in increased intrinsic religiosity. Our results suggest the relationship between analytic reasoning and intrinsic religiosity is more complex and nuanced than previously published, and establishes the importance of individual demographic characteristics for religiosity. Although our research was recently published in a top psychology journal, there were some unique publication challenges associated with this type of research that I will also discuss.

Resources:
- Audio recording
September 30, 2016

Title: "Embodying Forgiveness: Embracing Justice and Compassion"

Presenter: Charlotte vanOyen-Witvliet, Professor of Psychology, Hope College

Abstract: In this presentation, Professor Witvliet will address psychological discoveries that assist people who want to grant forgiveness. She will explore issues of justice and how forgiveness differs from reconciliation. Her research is bio-psycho-social-spiritual in nature. She will approach forgiveness as a moral response to interpersonal injustice that has beneficial emotional and physical side effects.

Resources:
- Audio recording
- Slides
October 7, 2016

Title: "Can Nature be ‘red in tooth and claw’ in the thought of Augustine? the later invention and misunderstanding of a major theologian"

Presenter: Stan Rosenberg; Executive Director, Scholarship & Christianity In Oxford; member of the Faculty of Theology and Religion, University of Oxford

Abstract: Can a Christian account of evil accept an understanding of nature as “red in tooth and claw” from the outset? At the core of Augustine’s theology, and the theological systems that shape the Augustinian tradition, is an approach to evil based on privation theory. This asserts a primal purity and a Fall subsequently corroding the original state. On the face of it, such an approach would seem to be — and is often interpreted as — the cause of decay, cataclysm, animal predation, and pain in the natural world. This view wholly conflicts with later understandings of evolutionary development. In evolutionary science, such violence is endemic; hence, so-called “natural evil” is an essential and ongoing operation in the physical and biological world. This talk challenges a commonly held view that Augustine argued for privation as the cause of physical and biological decay and so should be understood as contradictory to an evolutionary understanding. Alternatively, it presents the basis for understanding Augustine’s approach as treating natural cataclysm and violence as an original facet and essential activity in the natural world and so integral to natural history, not as a consequence of a Fall. Later interpreters who claim him as an authority in asserting that the natural world became alienated from God after the Fall, when violence and destruction were introduced into nature, have misconstrued his position. This investigation is necessary for defining whether one doing theology in an Augustinian tradition can readily support biological evolution, must reject it, or needs to alter the Augustinian approach to evil.

Resources:
- Audio recording
- Slides
November 4, 2016

Title: "The Grand Canyon of the Colorado River: Monument to Catastrophe? OR a Monument to an Ancient Earth?"

Presenter: Ralph Stearley; Geology, Geography, and Environmental Studies Department, Calvin College

Abstract: Many professional scientists and many people with a strong Christian commitment believe that some sort of ideological war exists and perhaps must necessarily exist between these two subcultures. The geologic record, including that of the history of life, has often been a focal point for tragic-comedic pronouncements. Paleontologic practitioners who wish to help advance public awareness of the protracted history of life must defuse the warfare paradigm while simultaneously eliminating simple ignorance. Since the 1960’s, the Grand Canyon of the Colorado River has been employed by Flood Geologists as a showcase for their interpretation of Earth history. In their model, the sedimentary layers of the canyon are divided into pre-Flood, and Flood layers. The Flood layers — thousands of feet of sedimentary rock — would have been deposited in one year’s span and then quickly eroded while yet soft, to form the present canyon in a few years. Fossils were deposited as ancient biotic communities were overwhelmed and buried. This talk will examine the fossil record to evaluate some of the claims of Flood-geologists for the Grand Canyon and will discuss the necessity to defuse the warfare paradigm. The new (summer, 2016) volume, Grand Canyon: Monument to an Ancient Earth (subtitle: Can Noah’s Flood Explain the Grand Canyon?), published by Kregel Press, will be available for purchase.

Resources:
- Audio recording
- Slides
November 18, 2016

Title: "To Divide or to Heal: Evolution, Climate Change, and the Church"

Presenter: Sarah Bodbyl Roels; Senior Researcher for Carbon TIME, Dept. of Teacher Education, Michigan State University

Abstract: Scientific debates primarily occur in the public sphere devoid of shared values, which can be alienating for church audiences. This creates a dual challenge to both bring the public sphere conversation into the church and bring Christian values into the public sphere discussion. Christian scientists are uniquely positioned to mediate these interactions and influence their ultimate outcomes. Evolution and climate change are two issues where people often perceive a disconnect between church and society. In this presentation, I will share some of my personal experiences re-framing evolution and climate change conflict as opportunities for discipleship and stewardship.

Resources:
- Slides
December 2, 2016

Title: "How Can Lessons from Christian Living Communities Inform our Approaches to Team Science?"

Presenter: Amy Wilstermann, Biology Department; and Rachael Baker, Chemistry Department; Calvin College

Abstract: Team approaches to science are valued in the broader scientific community. As biological problems become more complex and require multidisciplinary approaches, team science offers opportunities to extend the impact of individual scientists. Team science also offers attractive strategies for doing research in a small college environment, prioritizing efficiencies in space, time, and money, increased productivity, and mentoring. A scientist’s approach to doing science is informed by culture, beliefs, and values. As researchers at a Christian college, we wonder what the culture, values, and practices of our faith can add to the team approach to science. Christians have been thinking about how to live and work in community for centuries and we believe that Christian perspectives and established practices can inform conversations about how to do team science well. We will discuss key observations and insights obtained from visits and discussions with Christian living communities across the country and consider their application to team science conducted at Calvin College.

Resources:
- Audio recording
- Slides
Spring 2016
March 4, 2016

Title: "Living As Creatures: Wonder and Humility as Ecological Virtues"

Presenter: Steven Bouma-Prediger, Professor of Religion and Associate Dean for Teaching and Learning, Hope College

Abstract: In her award-winning book "Pilgrim at Tinker Creek," contemporary author Annie Dillard writes, after observing a mockingbird make a steep vertical descent only at the last second to land upright on the grass, that "beauty and grace are performed whether or not we will or sense them. The least we can do is try to be there." What does "trying to be there" mean? How can we prepare ourselves to more often and more easily perceive the beauty and grace of the natural world? What is wonder and how can it be cultivated? Have you ever wondered about wonder? In his influential book "The Rule of St. Benedict," sixth century monk Benedict of Nursia devotes the longest chapter to humility--famously tracing the 12 steps to humility--thereby laying the foundation for centuries of coenobitic monastic life centered around humility. But what exactly is humility? And how do we attain it? Is it possible to be proud of your humility? Have you ever hankered after humility? In this talk we will explore these two habitual dispositions and investigate the nature of what I call the ecological virtues. And we will look at what ecological literacy is and why it is one implication of cultivating these virtues. Are you eco-literate? Do you know your home place? Thus this talk will be of interest to all natural scientists and social scientists, humanists and artists--in short, to all students of our home planet.

Resources:
- Audio recording
- Slides
March 7, 2016

Title: "Showing of The Big Story: From Stardust to New Creation"

Presenter: Rev. Leonard Vander Zee, Interim Editor of The Banner.

Abstract: The Bible is the epic, sweeping, and continuing story of God that stretches from creation to redemption in Jesus Christ to new creation. But we cannot simply repeat the biblical story as if today’s science of origins were irrelevant. What if we told that grand biblical narrative with the scientific knowledge of the origins of the universe that the ancients did not have? Come watch a new 15-minute video from BioLogos, featuring beautiful visuals and Rev. Leonard Vander Zee as the story-teller. Vander Zee will be present to lead a time of discussion following the video.

March 4, 2016

Title: "Living As Creatures: Wonder and Humility as Ecological Virtues"

Presenter: Steven Bouma-Prediger, Professor of Religion and Associate Dean for Teaching and Learning, Hope College

Abstract: In her award-winning book "Pilgrim at Tinker Creek," contemporary author Annie Dillard writes, after observing a mockingbird make a steep vertical descent only at the last second to land upright on the grass, that "beauty and grace are performed whether or not we will or sense them. The least we can do is try to be there." What does "trying to be there" mean? How can we prepare ourselves to more often and more easily perceive the beauty and grace of the natural world? What is wonder and how can it be cultivated? Have you ever wondered about wonder? In his influential book "The Rule of St. Benedict," sixth century monk Benedict of Nursia devotes the longest chapter to humility--famously tracing the 12 steps to humility--thereby laying the foundation for centuries of coenobitic monastic life centered around humility. But what exactly is humility? And how do we attain it? Is it possible to be proud of your humility? Have you ever hankered after humility? In this talk we will explore these two habitual dispositions and investigate the nature of what I call the ecological virtues. And we will look at what ecological literacy is and why it is one implication of cultivating these virtues. Are you eco-literate? Do you know your home place? Thus this talk will be of interest to all natural scientists and social scientists, humanists and artists--in short, to all students of our home planet.

Resources:
- Audio recording
- Slides
April 29, 2016

Title: "The Hand of God and the Evolution of Life"

Presenter: Tom Boogaart, Professor of Old Testament, Western Theological Seminary.

Abstract: Both Catholics and Protestants in the late middle ages shared a cosmology, one forged by Thomas Aquinas. As their drawings and catechisms reveal, they believed that the hand of God was on the crystalline spheres and that God distributed life-giving power to the earth through these spheres. The discoveries of Galileo shattered these crystalline spheres, and Christians have struggled ever since to pick up the pieces and explain how the hand of God touches the world. Acknowledging the scientific discoveries of Galileo and others, theologians forged a new cosmology, a universe with two non-overlapping spheres: a spiritual sphere in which God resides and to which God draws humankind and a material sphere which is a self-contained system of matter and motion. This cosmology has not served Christians well. It blesses the present economic practices and complicates the conversation between faith and science. The secure findings of the evolutionary sciences offer Christian theologians not only a challenge to traditional doctrines but also an opportunity to recover a more integrated and biblical cosmology. The story of the emergence of life and consciousness on our planet suggests that God’s relationship to the material sphere is much more intimate and glorious than the two-sphere cosmology allows, and this emergence of life comports well with various biblical images of God creating and sustaining the orders of creation.

Resources:
- Audio recording
- Slides
May 6, 2016

Title: "The Neglected Role of Guilt in the Modern Practice of Medicine"

Presenter: Dr. John Patrick, Associate Professor in Clinical Nutrition, retired, University of Ottawa.

Abstract: Fifty years ago people came for medical help because of what they perceived God or nature had done to them. Today, many diseases are at least to some extent self-induced by life style and behavioral factors. Patients are suffering and are also aware that their self-induced diseases are inflicting pain on themselves, their families, and society. This often produces deep feelings of shame and guilt. There is no medicine for guilt. Is it time for the health professions to rethink their relationship with the church? Dr. Patrick retired from the University of Ottawa in 2002, where he was Associate Professor of Clinical Nutrition in the Departments of Biochemistry and Pediatrics for 20 years. He currently speaks on the intersection of culture, faith, medicine, and public policy.

Resources:
- Audio recording

Fall 2015
October 30, 2015

Title: "Justice for the Earth: A Way Forward"

Presenter: Ken Piers, Emeritus Professor of Chemistry, Calvin College

Abstract: This seminar will present a brief review of where the earth currently stands in the progression of climate change. Second, we will review (again briefly) several statements that have been prepared by different religious communities about climate change and human response to the challenges climate change presents. Lastly we will present a proposal launched by the Citizen’s Climate Lobby, a non-partisan, grassroots national organization in which it may be possible for humans in this nation and across the world to find common ground.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
- Handout
November 13, 2015

Title: "Does God Need Quantum Mechanics?"

Presenter: Jeffrey Koperski, Professor of Philosophy, Saginaw Valley State University.

Abstract: Christians believe that God has ordained the laws of nature. At least since Leibniz, though, many theists have been uncomfortable with the view that God also occasionally breaks those laws in order to act within nature. Today, noninterventionists look for ways in which God might act without violating natural law. Most proposals involve quantum indeterminacy. In this talk, we will consider some of the philosophical and scientific arguments for noninterventionism to see whether God in some sense needs quantum mechanics to keep from violating the laws of nature.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
November 20, 2015

Title: "The Primary Solution: Primary Care Accomplishing Justice in the U.S. Health Care System"

Presenter: Marika Jeltema, Calvin College student.

Abstract: The United States health care needs reform, costs are high and effectiveness is questionable. Many procedures amount to treating symptoms as opposed to preventing core problems. The reform necessary to create an effective health care system in the U.S. includes addressing three threats to primary care physicians: the state of medical education, technology encroachment, and the mechanisms by which primary care providers are incentivized and physicians reimbursed. As a society, increased use of primary care as an avenue to improved health is an ethically preferable position, implicating justice, physician’s fidelity, and non-maleficence. Medical education should place greater focus on the practice of preventative medicine, leading to a greater number of medical students who elect to pursue primary care, commensurate with a change from procedure based billing which favors specialties to a financial model that enables young physicians to repay tuition debt. Increasing the number of residencies available for new primary care physicians will require a shift both in government subsidies and cultural prioritization of primary care. Application of technologies such as electronic medical records, and patient use of diagnostic information via the internet detract from the limited time available for patient-doctor interaction and should be adopted with care. Primary care methods can be redesigned, valuing quality over quantity of visits, cultivating team practice. Sufficient and effective primary care is critical to the redesign of a sustainable health care system capable of improving individual and public health.

December 4, 2015

Title: "The Venema Revelation and Conditional Probabilities: Bayesian Updating, David Hilbert, Kolmogorov, & God"

Presenter: Steve Wykstra, Philosophy Department, Calvin College with student researchers Denise Dykstra and Paul Manata

Abstract: When they get new evidence, Christians, like everybody else, sometimes revise their beliefs. Sometimes they even revise their religious beliefs. Revising our religious beliefs can, of course, trouble and befuddle us. Can probability theory be of any help, shedding any light on when and why and how such revision should go? Philosophers here divide, but Wykstra will explain how he and many philosophers of religion have routinely used probability theory, especially “Bayes’ theorem,” to illuminate judgments how to belief-revision on getting new evidence. Wykstra will then go over some perplexing issues about “Bayesian updating” arising from a paper, co-authored with former Calvin student Tim Perrine, about how one how evidence should be handled within scientific and worldview “research programs.” The issues, as noted by UC Berkeley philosopher Lara Buchak, may connect to proposals in formal epistemology that in some situations, evidentially updating must rely on an “Infomin” rule that emerged in the landmark 1948 work by C.E. Shannon in information science and code theory. Professor Wykstra will introduce his two-student team, Denise Dykstra and Paul Manata, who have been working with him in this area. He will explain how something he learned four years ago from Professor Venema about David Hilbert and geometry has given a deeper perspective on Kolmogorov’s axiomatization of probability, and review some of the progress the team has made. Wykstra and team are eager for your thoughts on how probability theory might illuminate the process of extending, testing and revising core beliefs when deployed within research programs for interpreting and understanding the world we live in.
Spring 2015
February 6, 2015

Title: "The Rise of Deluge Geology: Calvin Tossed by Waves"

Presenter: Ralph Stearley, Geology, Geography, and Environmental Sciences Department, Calvin College

Abstract: During the past century, a “warfare paradigm” for the relationship of science and faith has been aggressively promoted by some Christians and some prominent materialist scientists. Often, the geologic record including the record of the history of life has been a focal point for tragic-comedic pronouncements. It is generally recognized that a principal component of misinformation undergirding this warfare mentality was simplistic and/or malicious historiography accomplished during the late nineteenth century, regarding the historical relationship between science and Christianity. During the past generation, historians of science have debunked the warfare metaphor. Yet, since 1960, a large number of evangelical Christians have somehow succumbed to the parallel claims that mainstream geologists are untrustworthy and that Noah’s Flood is responsible for much if not most of the global stratigraphic record (“Deluge Geology”). Calvin College science faculty have grappled with the technical and cultural issues surrounding the history of Earth and life for over 70 years. This presentation will explore how our current cultural scene has emerged, with twin foci: a) the rise of modern Deluge Geology, and b) the effort that Calvin scientists, theologically sited within a Reformed sense of God’s rule over nature, have exerted to defuse the warfare metaphor.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
February 13, 2015

Title: "Lions and tigers and bears, oh my!: Evolution's Big Three Challenges to Theism"

Presenter: Jeffrey Schloss, Professor of Biology at Westmont College; Director, Center for Faith, Ethics & Life Sciences; Senior Scholar at BioLogos.

Abstract: The "creation - evolution debate" is of course not a single controversy at all, but entails disagreements about numerous issues, including the adequacy of scientific evidence for key proposals of evolution like common descent, the teaching (if any) of scriptures on issues like earth's age and a primordial human pair, and - the focus of this talk - the general implications of evolution for biblical theism. Three issues have commanded particular attention from the time of Darwin until the present: the question of design and divine purpose in nature, the issue of human "animality" and its implications for moral responsibility, and the way in which evolution is seen to exacerbate the problem of natural evil. Although these issues are both complex and legitimately important, their assessment is often dominated by polarized pronouncements that the findings of science are both clear and utterly noxious in their implications for belief in a wise and moral Creator, or that they present no serious challenge. This talk will describe and assess new findings in evolutionary theory that make the first extreme unfounded, but do not fully justify the second. It will argue that, rightly understood, evolution can be seen as concordant with but not demonstrative of theism, and is beset by the ambiguity that has always attended Christian reflection on the natural world. Seeing concord does not just provoke, but requires theistic belief.

February 27, 2015

Title: "Light of the World: Uncovering the Unexpected Through Science and Scripture"

Presenter: Kathryn Applegate, BioLogos Program Director.

Abstract: In John 8:12 and 9:5, Jesus calls himself the light of the world. Light and darkness–seeing and not seeing–are apt images for how we come to understand who Jesus is as well as for how we do science. In both cases, we need eyes to see something new, a way to look beyond the existing paradigm to a more coherent view of reality. This was true for first-century Jews awaiting a political savior in a Roman-occupied land; this is true for scientists today who study the workings of the world God has made. So often who God is and what he has done, whether in our lives, in Scripture, or in the created order itself, are not what we would have expected. We will consider several examples from both Scripture and science where the unexpected sheds new light on the character of God. Reflecting on the unexpected can be especially helpful for those who are new to thinking about how evolution could accord with the God of the Bible.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
April 23, 2015

Title: "Confronting our Brainhood and Substantive Alienation"

Presenter: Carl Gillett, Professor of Philosophy, Northern Illinois University.

Abstract: Scientific, and wider, discussions now routinely feature the claim that neuroscientific advances make it plausible that we are brains that have what I term ‘rich’ psychological properties like remembering breakfast, fearing cancer etc. Call this the ‘Expansive Brain’ view. However, such discussions are rarely clear about the nature of this type of claim or offer detailed arguments in its support. In contrast, philosophical discussions of what we are feature precise frameworks and arguments. But virtually no philosophers accept any version of the Brain view, instead endorsing either psychological or Animalist views. Philosophical discussions cannot thus be accused of neuromania – far from it. Philosophical debates about what we are still largely use the method of cases and rarely use empirical evidence from the neurosciences or elsewhere. In this paper, I seek to bring these two debates together and I defend a number of inter-locking conclusions. First, I look at work in cognitive neuroscience and argue that the neurosciences are plausibly taken to posit rich psychological properties like episodic remembering. Second, building on this result, I show that cognitive neuroscience plausibly defends the existence of what I term ‘expansive brains,’ that is brains that instantiate rich psychology. Third, using recent philosophical work, I illustrate how neuroscientific evidence can be brought to bear on the issue of what we are, hence showing that we can finally avoid the method of cases and establishing you are plausibly an expansive brain. Lastly, I outline the wide range of recent scientific evidence about our neurocognitive natures that explains both why we are so resistant to the Expansive Brain view and why we are also so deeply inclined to the mistaken views that we are minds or animals.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
April 24, 2015

Title: "Fundamentalism vs. Mutualism: Understanding our Ongoing Debates over Reduction and Emergence"

Presenter: Carl Gillett, Professor of Philosophy, Northern Illinois University.

Abstract: I contend that our theoretical frameworks for debates over ‘reduction’ and ‘emergence’ are badly lagging, often even obscuring, the exciting, ongoing debates in the sciences. To support this point, I outline what I take to be more adequate frameworks that reconstruct the debates at the ‘local’ level of concrete scientific cases. I show how the arguments and position of scientific reductionists flow from compositional explanations in the sciences and lead them to what I term ‘Fundamentalism’ which only accepts components as determinative, but still accepts a macro-world and higher sciences to study it. Reconstructing the claims of self-identified scientific emergentists, I outline what I term ‘Mutualism’ built around mutually determinative parts and wholes, highlight why it shows the most common argument for scientific reductionism is invalid, and how it frames one of the live views in the sciences. I then provide a valid argument for scientific reductionism in cases of compositional explanation and highlight its high evidential demands. I consequently detail two live views for scientific reductionists in what I term ‘Simple’ and ‘Conditioned Fundamentalism’. Most importantly, I highlight the issues between the live Mutualist and Fundamentalist views in concrete ‘local’ cases, illustrate why these disputes are empirically resolvable, and outline why, as yet, none of these competing views about ‘reduction’ and ‘emergence’ has (as yet) been established in a concrete scientific case.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
May 8, 2015

Title: "Stress in Early Childhood: impact on the brain and implications for interventions"

Presenter: Emily Helder, Psychology Department, Calvin College.

Abstract: Professor Helder will examine the impact of early stressful experiences such as abuse/neglect, orphanage stays, and poverty on neuroanatomical development. The influences of such stress on cognition, behavior, and emotions will be discussed. Additionally, the talk will also address intervention and educational approaches with these children.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
Fall 2014
September 19, 2014

Title: "Planning for Big Data"

Presenter: Patrick Bailey, Computer Science Department, Calvin College.

Abstract: It's the new oil. It's the next wave. But, just what is "Big Data?" How do you know what to do with it? Planning a big data project can be expensive and time consuming. There is a rich set of tools available for working with data, but none will provide an answer if the process didn't start with a good question. This talk provides an overview of the planning process and considerations to develop good questions.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
October 3, 2014

Title: "Food x Faith: Consumptive Choices Could Solve TWO Big Global Problems AND Save Money"

Presenter: David Dornbos, Biology Department, Calvin College.

Abstract: While “Creation Care” is trendy in some elements of “the church,” it certainly does not seem to be mainstream nor is it driving sweeping changes in behaviors of Christian lifestyle. And whether we sense it or not, admit it or not from where we sit, global food security has already been undermined by environmental degradation. So as global human population swells toward 9 billion, it seems as though we may need to choose between food security and environmental health, intensifying industrial agriculture or developing a new food system model. Do these need to be choices? Could consumptive choices, changes in our dietary aesthetic, save us money through lower healthcare costs and protect environmental integrity at local and global scales?

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
October 10, 2014

Title: "Evolution and Christian Ethics: Mapping the Terrain"

Presenter: Criag Boyd, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Saint Louis University.

Abstract: In this talk, I look at what I think are four ways in which scientists and ethicists have considered normative ethics in light of evolutionary theory. I have tentatively labelled them the conformers, the resisters, the maximizers, and the transformers. The first two accept the idea of evolution as a basically “selfish” process. The latter two see it as ambivalent. The conformers think that the “ought” of ethics should be determined by the “is” of evolutionary biology. The resisters think that we should somehow try to “fight back” against the power of the selfish genes. The maximizers think that since evolution is ambivalent there are resources within the human person that can enable her, when properly cultivated, to accentuate the positive and eliminate the negative. Finally, the transformers see the need for a normative account of ethics that moves the agent beyond the impulses and drives of nature itself. For the transformer, a “something more” is needed and can come in the form of the normative power of reason. It is within this camp that I think Christian ethics can come to peace with evolutionary biology.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
October 30, 2014

Title: "Faith and Wisdom in Science"

Presenter: Tom McLeish, Professor of Physics, Durham University.

Abstract: In search of a healthy public narrative for science, this lecture suggests that Old Testament Wisdom literature, taken alongside the human practice of science today, represents an untapped theological resource that the church needs to engage with science and technology based issues. Our principal text is the Book of Job. Motivating a move from “Theology and Science” to “Theology of Science,” we draw out the consequences of a framework for science as participatory reconciliation between humans and the natural world.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
November 7, 2014

Title: "Reconsidering the Criteria for Scientific Success: Love over Truth?"

Presenter: Rob Barrett, Director of Forums and Scholarship, Colossian Forum.

Abstract: The Colossian Forum engages divisive topics of faith, science, and culture as opportunities for Christian formation. As we have led forums that engage questions such as origins and human sexuality within the context of the Great Commandment, forum participants and observers have regularly voiced concerns that subordinating the pursuit of truth to the pursuit of love means we never make progress toward the truth. But Christian love, unlike liberal tolerance or celebration of diversity for its own sake, does not impede the pursuit of truth but rather motivates and sustains it. In this talk, I describe The Colossian Forum’s approach to engaging divisive issues among Christians with examples drawn from conflicts over origins and sexuality. I examine our reasons for subordinating truth to love and argue that, perhaps surprisingly, positioning truth within a context of love holds a potential for acquiring both, while hoping for love to emerge from the pursuit of truth sometimes fails to produce either. I will argue this at three levels. First, Christians should be careful when naming the kinds of truth we pursue to avoid limiting the category of truth to solutions to technical problems. Second, experts working on contentious topics easily fall into defensive postures that both replace self-giving love with fear and anger and obscure the truth they pursue. Third, popular appropriation of any scientific expertise that has relevance for culture requires more than assenting to expert information, for formation of individual and social life requires a range of capacities that Christians traditionally label virtues, with love being the virtue that inspires and animates all of the others.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
November 14, 2014

Title: "Brain Function Secrets Revealed"

Presenter: Paul Moes, Psychology Department, Calvin College.

Abstract: In this talk, Professor Moes will introduce the idea that the brain is a modular but interacting system. Although there is a great deal of specialized function in various areas, complex thought occurs when multiple brain areas “merge” their collective processes. He will draw from his own research on individuals born without a corpus callosum (connecting left and right hemisphere). Although these individuals are able to function in society reasonably well, they have difficulty with “complex novel problem solving” and high level social functioning. This example illustrates that although the separate modules of the left and right hemisphere work fine, they need to work together to establish higher-level learning and complex integration of knowledge. This integration of brain areas helps us to better understand what it means to be a person created in God’s image.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
Spring 2014
February 21, 2014

Title: "Randomness, Divine Providence, and Anxiety"

Presenter: Jim Bradley, Mathematics Department (emeritus), Calvin College.

Abstract: Scientists often assert that some aspect of the natural world evidences randomness. However, for many people – not just scientists – the existence of randomness in nature seems inconsistent with the existence of a divine being who is omniscient, omnipotent, sovereign, and who acts with providential care. This presentation will offer a response to this theological anxiety about randomness. It will argue that much of the apparent conflict arises from misunderstandings of randomness and that, rightly understood, randomness can be seen as originating in the divine nature; it will also provide a speculative but plausible explanation of the divine use of randomness in evolution.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
March 7, 2014

Title: Showing of "Looking for the Missing Link between Faith and Reason"

Presenter: Leo Hagedorn, the writer and producer, a middle school science teacher in Traverse City, MI, will introduce the movie.

Abstract: "If you don't believe in Young Earth creationism you don’t belong in this church!" The sermon that day was an ultimatum. I needed to find out for myself if I had to choose between faith and science, or was there a link that was missed along the way? This movie, Looking for the Missing Link between Faith and Reason, asks you to weigh the evidence and draw your own conclusion to what you believe. It features interviews with Francis Collins, Brian Mclaren, Rob Bell, Ed Dobson, Ken Ham, Nancey Murphy, Ken Miller, and Deborah and Loren Haarsma. Students: if you’re wrestling with this issue, here’s a chance to follow the steps a fellow believer took to investigate. Professors and students: here’s a chance to see if this is a movie you might recommend for adult education or a study group at your church.

Resources:
- Web page for the movie
March 14, 2014

Title: "Modern genomics and human evolution"

Presenter: Dennis Venema, Biology Department, Trinity Western University.

Abstract: In recent years the rapidly expanding field of comparative genomics has thrown much light on human origins. This evidence confirms our evolutionary history as a species nested within the great apes, demonstrates that our speciation took place as a population, and reveals that our speciation was prolonged and complex, with genetic exchange between our lineage and closely-related hominins. Recent advances in paleogenomics – the sequencing of DNA from long-extinct species – as well as deeper investigation of our own genetic diversity will serve to refine our understanding of our evolutionary past in the near future. I will describe these scientific findings and speak briefly about their theological significance in this Biology department seminar; I will explore the theological questions in greater depth at a Christian Perspectives in Science seminar later in the day.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
March 14, 2014

Title: "Christianity and evolution: lessons from the past, prospects for the future"

Presenter: Dennis Venema, Biology Department, Trinity Western University.

Abstract: Evangelical Christianity has a long history of interaction with prevailing scientific issues. While recent advances in comparative genomics have greatly improved our scientific understanding of human origins, evangelicals are only beginning to grapple with the implications of these discoveries for long-held theological views. Do humans descend from a historical Adam and Eve? Is original sin inherited biologically? What does it mean to be created in the image of God? This seminar will explore the theological issues arising out of recent genomics evidence, and draw on lessons from our history that may be helpful for the present discussion.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
April 3, 2014

Title: "Why the Church Needs to Talk About Evolution"

Presenter: Deborah Haarsma, President of BioLogos.org.

Abstract: For some Christians, the word "evolution" is dangerous and atheistic, pulling people away from God and the Bible. But other Christians see evolution as a scientific description of how God created the abundant variety of life on earth. Congregations that consider evolution are better equipped to evangelize scientists, disciple young people, and impact our science-minded society.

April 4, 2014

Title: "Evolutionary Evils and the Goodness of God: The Darwinian Problem of Animal Suffering"

Presenter: John Schneider, Religion Department emeritus, Calvin College.

Abstract: Scientific discovery of a “Darwinian World” generates a new form of the old problem of God and natural evils. This “Darwinian Problem” arises from the unveiling of previously unimagined amounts, kinds, and distributions of apparently random, morally purposeless suffering by animals in the concurrent systems of nature and also during an unfathomably long span of pre-human time. We must wonder whether such systems, which inscribe such horrific suffering into the conditions of existence for so many animals, could be the design of the omnipotent and loving God of Christian theism. I maintain that prevailing God-justifying explanations are unconvincing. Contrary to Neo-Cartesian theory, many animals do suffer in ways that should matter to us morally. Further, “lapsarian” appeals to a world-ruinous Fall fail on both scientific and analytical grounds. Still further, “Only Way” appeals to the inevitability of such natural evils in any comparably “regular” physical world violate our intuition of divine omnipotence. Finally, “Skeptical Theism”—appeal to the epistemic likelihood on theism of our not knowing the God-justifying explanation—violates our intuition of divine love. Rather than concede the argument, or retreat into “fideism,” I propose renovation of ancient aesthetic theodicy along non-lapsarian lines. Taking off from the framework of Irenaeus (d. c. 200) rather than the familiar lapsarian theodicy of Augustine (354-430), and using the book of Job and Romans (especially 8-11), I propose that “God the Artist” deliberately integrated natural evils into the world, with the God-justifying goal of “defeating” them in and through the Incarnation, Atonement, and Resurrection of Christ. The cosmic glory of a world brought about via the “defeat” of evils (rightly understood) is much greater in goodness for all creatures and things than any world brought about without them. (Part 2 of this seminar was given on May 9 -- see below.)

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
April 4, 2014

Title: "Seeking Adam: Questions from Genetics"

Presenter: David Wilcox, Biology Department emeritus, Eastern University.

Abstract: As the science of genetics has developed, an increasing number of data points indicate difficulties in the traditional theological understanding of human origins. This paper focus on three such areas. First, timing, place and movement during the beginnings of human history, including the possibility of an early bottleneck. Second, recent evidence on the timing and extent of interbreeding with the Neanderthals, with an evaluation of the likely impact of such interbreeding on human function. Third, an evaluation of genetic evidences which indicates that human uniqueness should be viewed as product of dramatic functional alterations in the genetic control of neural development. And finally, along the way, a consideration of the possibilities for theological integration which these points raise.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
Fall 2013
November 1, 2013, 2013

Title: "Illegals, Invasives, and Citizenship in Leopold's Biotic Community"

Presenter: Rolf Bouma, Pastor for Academic Ministries at the Campus Chapel and Lecturer in the Program in the Environment, University of Michigan.

Abstract: Aldo Leopold sought to replace a mechanistic approach to land management with appreciation of the land as biotic community, of which humans were "citizen and plain member." Current attitudes towards human community and biotic community are inconsistent, with those favoring open human communities being allied to nativist biotic communities and vice versa. Are human and biotic communities really incommensurate, or is more consistency warranted between human society and biotic systems? These questions have urgency in light of current proposals in conservation biology, especially assisted migration of species as a response to climate change.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
Spring 2013
February 8, 2014

Title: "More than Meets the Eye: Unpacking Decisions about How to Teach."

Presenter: David Smith, Director of Kuyers Institute for Christian Teaching and Learning, Calvin College.

Abstract: This presentation will focus on the complexity of what happens in classrooms from the teacher's point of view. Together we will unpack a range of factors affecting the choices made within a short segment of teaching and learning, exploring how apparently simple teaching decisions can draw in a range of overlapping considerations. In so doing, the aim will be not only to show that there is more going on than may meet the eye, but also to begin to explore how our Christian beliefs and values might enter into everyday decisions about how to organize what we do in classrooms. In the discussion time, we'll focus on how this applies to teaching science and Christian perspectives in sciences classes.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
February 15, 2014

Title: "Created for Everlasting Life: Is Theistic Evolution Sufficient to Explain Original Human Nature?"

Presenter: John Cooper, Professor of Philosophical Theology, Calvin Theological Seminary.

Abstract: Christians often endorse theistic evolution or evolutionary creation as the best way of combining science and Scripture to explain God's creation of humans. Scripture teaches that God created humans for everlasting life and receive it through Christ. The transition from life to everlasting life through death and resurrection requires God's supernatural action and a generic person-body dualism sufficient for personal existence beyond one's earthly body. Thus theistic human evolution that is consistent with biblical eschatology must affirm theistic supernaturalism and a minimally dualistic anthropology. I will argue that some current versions of theistic evolution meet these conditions, and some do not – in particular those committed to theistic naturalism and emergent physicalism.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
March 1, 2013

Title: "A Universe Fine-tuned for Scientific Technology and Discovery"

Presenter: Robin Collins, Distinguished Professor of Philosophy and Chair of the Department of Philosophy, Messiah College.

Abstract: In this talk, Professor Robin Collins will first present some of his recent research on the many ways in which the structure of the universe is precisely set, to an incredible degree of accuracy, so that we can develop technology and discover its structure. Then he will show how this fine-tuning for technology and discoverability undercuts the multiverse explanation, the leading non-theistic explanation for the much discussed fine-tuning of the universe for life. Finally, he will discuss how it provides important insight into God’s purposes for humans along with its theological implications.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
April 5, 2013

Title: "Mathematical Research: Invention or Discovery"

Presenter: Christopher Moseley, Mathematics and Statistics Department, Calvin College.

Abstract: What is the meaning of mathematical research? Are the results purely inventions of the human mind, or are mathematicians engaged in discovery of properties of mathematical structures? In this talk I will examine proposed answers to this question in the light of classical and modern research in mathematics, and will suggest that research in mathematics has more in common with the physical sciences than is commonly believed.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
April 13, 2013

Title: "Origins Today: Genesis Through Ancient Eyes"

Presenter: John Walton, Professor of Old Testament, Wheaton College.

Abstract: The rift between faith and science in Christian circles today often results in the marginalization of Christians engaged in the sciences, impediments to evangelism, and the attrition of young believers who are told that Christianity is incompatible with the acceptance of evolution or an old earth. John Walton’s work in Genesis 1–3 offers a fresh perspective on this complex issue by seeking to understand the message of Scripture within its ancient context. A close reading of the Genesis creation account and an evaluation of its ancient Near Eastern setting raise the question of whether the Bible provides modern scientific information related to our understanding of the natural world (e.g., cosmology, biology, or human origins), or whether it offers a theological, rather than material, framework for thinking about the cosmos—for example, God made everything and is sovereign over it. This question in turn leads us to inquire whether today’s scientific conclusions regarding old earth, common descent, and parentage of the human race necessarily conflict with the Bible or theology.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
April 13, 2013

Title: "Origins Today: Genesis Through Ancient Eyes"

Presenter: John Walton, Professor of Old Testament, Wheaton College.

Abstract: The rift between faith and science in Christian circles today often results in the marginalization of Christians engaged in the sciences, impediments to evangelism, and the attrition of young believers who are told that Christianity is incompatible with the acceptance of evolution or an old earth. John Walton’s work in Genesis 1–3 offers a fresh perspective on this complex issue by seeking to understand the message of Scripture within its ancient context. A close reading of the Genesis creation account and an evaluation of its ancient Near Eastern setting raise the question of whether the Bible provides modern scientific information related to our understanding of the natural world (e.g., cosmology, biology, or human origins), or whether it offers a theological, rather than material, framework for thinking about the cosmos—for example, God made everything and is sovereign over it. This question in turn leads us to inquire whether today’s scientific conclusions regarding old earth, common descent, and parentage of the human race necessarily conflict with the Bible or theology.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
- Slides
Fall 2012
September 6, 2012

Title: "Evolution, Human Origins, Scripture, and the Reformed Confessions"

Presenter: James K.A. Smith (Philosophy Department, Calvin College) and Loren Haarsma (Physics & Astronomy Department, Calvin College).

Abstract: Loren Haarsma of the Calvin Physics department and Jamie Smith, of the Calvin Philosophy department, report on the state of the conversation about Reformed perspectives on human origins, exploring issues at the intersection of evolution and the Reformed confessions.

Resources:
- Audio recording (.wma)
October 7, 2012

Title: "Evolution, Christian Faith, and Human Origins"

Presenter: Jeff Schloss, T.B. Walker Chair of Natural & Behavioral Sciences and director of the Center for Faith, Ethics & Life Sciences, Westmont College.

This event was not part of the Christian Perspectives in Science seminar series, but should be of interest to many attenders of CPiS seminars.

Church of the Servant Recordings

October 14, 2012

Title: "Reading the Whole Page"

Presenter: Christiana de Groot, professor of religion, Calvin College.

This event was not part of the Christian Perspectives in Science seminar series, but should be of interest to many attenders of CPiS seminars.

Church of the Servant Recordings

October 28, 2012

Title: "Adam and Eve, the Fall, and Original Sin in Light of Human Evolution"

Presenter: Dan Harlow, professor of religion, Calvin College.

This event was not part of the Christian Perspectives in Science seminar series, but should be of interest to many attenders of CPiS seminars.

Church of the Servant Recordings
Spring 2012

February 17, 2012

Title: "The New U.S. Farm Bill"

Presenter: Jamie Skillen, GEO Department, Calvin College

February 12, 2012

Title: "Do you Understand What You Are Reading? Interpreting Genesis 1-11"

Presenter: Rev. Scott Hoezee, Director, Center for Excellence in Preaching, Calvin Seminary

This event was not part of the Christian Perspectives in Science seminar series, but should be of interest to many attenders of CPiS seminars.

Church of the Servant Recordings

February 19, 2012

Title: "Evolution and One Christian Biologist: From Eyes Shut Tight to Eyes Open Wide to See God's Greatness"

Presenter: Arlene J. Hoogewerf, professor of biology, Calvin College

This event was not part of the Christian Perspectives in Science seminar series, but should be of interest to many attenders of CPiS seminars.

Church of the Servant Recordings

February 26, 2012

Title: "Evolving Views on Creation and Neo-Darwinian Evolution"

Presenter: Brian Madison, assistant professor of religion, Calvin College

This event was not part of the Christian Perspectives in Science seminar series, but should be of interest to many attenders of CPiS seminars.

Church of the Servant Recordings

February 26, 2012

Title: "Evolving Views on Creation and Neo-Darwinian Evolution"

Presenter: Brian Madison, assistant professor of religion, Calvin College

This event was not part of the Christian Perspectives in Science seminar series, but should be of interest to many attenders of CPiS seminars.

Church of the Servant Recordings

Fall/winter 2006
September 15, 2006

Title: "Is There a Purpose in the Living World? Some Thoughts about Creation and Emergent Evolution"

Presenter: Jaap Klapwijk, Free University in Amsterdam

Abstract: I feel it is objectionable to say that God created through evolution, but we can say that God created a world that is characterized by evolution. In such an evolutionary world, full of chance variations and natural selection, is there place for a purpose? Evolution implies an element of continuity and of discontinuity. To understand this, the notion of emergent evolution is helpful. In an evolutionary development there is not just a continuous line. Phenomena with an element of discontinuity and irreducible newness can emerge. Life, for instance, is a phenomenon that emerges at a new organizational level: a biotic level. But in the living world we can also speak of a vegetative, a sensitive and a mental level. These levels are idionomous, i.e. each is governed by special laws that, in some way, represent God's creation ordinances. Evolution is not without chance and randomness. But in so far as it is embedded in a hierarchy of organizational levels and oriented to divine laws it is directional, and we might speak of purpose in the living world.

Resources:
- audio recording (.wma)
September 29, 2006

Title: "Outdoor Experiences for the Young and Young at Heart"

Presenter: Cheryl Hoogewind,Calvin Ecosystem Preserve Manager, Calvin College

Abstract: When was the last time you spent an hour or more outdoors enjoying God's creation? People are spending more and more time indoors keeping busy with computers, televisions, Xboxes, video games, Ipods, and many other kinds of technology. We are over-scheduling our lives with organized sports, music lessons, and school activities of all kinds. Richard Louv poses some interesting questions in his book Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder. What is happening to our children and ourselves because we are not spending time in nature? What is capturing our attention? There are simple ways to give children outdoor experiences in their own backyards and to encourage wonder and creativity. In this seminar, I will share my ideas and give suggestions about how we can avoid "nature-deficit disorder."

Resources:
- powerpoint slides
- audio recording first half (.wma)
- audio recording second half (.wma)
October 12, 2006*

Title: "Evangelicals and Climate Change"

Presenter: Rev. Jim Ball, Ph.D., Executive Director, Evangelical Environmental Network

October 27, 2006

Title: "Human Origins: Scientific Theories and Christian Theologies"

Presenter: John Cooper, Professor of Philosophical Theology, Calvin Theological Seminary

Abstract: This presentation attempts a general mapping of the various positions on creation and evolution held by Christians. It identifies three main readings of Genesis 1-3 (literal-historical-theological, literary-historical-theological, and literary-theological), three main theological paradigms of redemptive-history (Augustinian, Neo-platonic, and Modernist), and four theories of human origins (recent creation, progressive creation, biological evolution, anthropological evolution). The presentation then explores the implications, convergences, and tensions among these positions. This is the overview I present to students at Calvin Seminary before locating the position taken by the Synod of the Christian Reformed Church. Dialogue and criticism are welcome.

Resources:
- handout from speaker
November 3, 2006

Title: "What is a Number? Augustine's Philosophy of Mathematics"

Presenter: Jim Bradley, Mathematics Department; Director of Assessment & Institutional Research, Calvin College

Abstract: In De Libero Arbitrio, Augustine of Hippo presents an argument for the existence of God. Because the argument depends in an essential way on mathematics, Augustine expands at some length on its nature. This talk will examine the implications of his views for the four classical questions of the philosophy of mathematics: In what sense are mathematical assertions true? What is the nature of mathematical objects, for example, numbers? Since such objects seem immaterial but we are material beings, how do we acquire knowledge of them? How do we account for the astonishing effectiveness of mathematics in describing the physical world? Also, Augustine's views on mathematics have implications for many other questions. If there is time, this talk will address two in particular: How are we to understand God's freedom? And how are we to understand the nature of logic?

Resources:
- powerpoint slides
- audio recording (.wma)
November 10, 2006

Title: "The Realm of Ghosts: Sickness and Death in the Early Holland Colony"

Presenter: Dr. Jan Peter Verhave, Visiting Research Fellow, Van Raalte Institute, Hope College; and microbiologist at the Radboud University Medical Centre of Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Abstract: While at the Van Raalte Institute, Dr. Jan Peter Verhave is doing research on the state of health of the early Dutch immigrants and their vulnerability to certain diseases, as derived from reports on their physical well-being in letters to family and friends in the Netherlands. Particularly during the first few years the settlers suffered a lot, and the poor living conditions triggered some fatal diseases. Epidemic diseases came, as well as the naturalization trial: the Michigan ague. Dr. Verhave is a microbiologist at the Radboud University Medical Centre of Nijmegen, the Netherlands, and is an authority on the history of malaria and tropical diseases. In addition, he has an interest in religious and social matters of nineteenth century Netherlands and has dug up a collection of letters to immigrants in Iowa, which recently appeared in Iowa Letters (2004). He has published a book and significant articles on church history and on the issue of religion and vaccination.

Resources:
- audio recording (.wma)
November 17, 2006

Title: "Intelligent Design on Trial"

Presenter: Edward B. Davis, Professor of the History of Science, Messiah College

Abstract: Dr. Davis, who attended the Dover trial and who has published several articles about science and religion in modern America, will provide an overview of the "intelligent design" issue. He will explain some of the main ideas associated with intelligent design, discuss the political and educational goals and strategies of the intelligent design movement, and comment on the recent Dover School District trial.

Resources:
- powerpoint slides
- audio recording (.wma)
December 1, 2006

Title: "The Search for Extra-terrestrial Life"

Presenters: Larry Molnar and Loren Haarsma, Physics & Astronomy Department, Calvin College

Abstract: As of now, there is no evidence of life beyond earth. But within the last decade, astronomers have discovered over a hundred planets in other solar systems, and they are on the verge of being technically capable of detecting earth-like planets (if any exist) in nearby star systems. In this talk, we will review the current status of the search for extra-solar planets, as well as the search for life beyond earth in our own solar system. We'll also review current hypotheses, both scientific and theological, for how life first arose on earth. Then we'll turn to the question: If extraterrestrial life - even single-celled life – was discovered, what would be some of the scientific and theological consequences?

Resources:
- powerpoint slides
- audio recording (.wma)
Spring 2007
February 2, 2007

Title: "Epiphany for a Small Planet: Christology, Astronomy, and Mutuality"

Presenter: Alan Padgett, Professor of Systematic Theology, Luther Seminary. Crosson Fellow at the Center for Philosophy of Religion at Notre Dame University, 2006-2007

Abstract: Does the new picture of the vast cosmos we learn from science change our theology? What difference would alien intelligent life make to our Christology? After presenting a "mutuality" model for the relationship between theology and natural sciences (as developed in my 2003 book) I will explore these questions, using astrobiology and Christology as my example of mutuality.

Co-sponsor: Calvin Philosophy Department

Resources:
- powerpoint slides
- audio recording (.wma)
February 9, 2007

Title: "De ordine creationis: a theological approach to the nature of mathematical reasoning"

Presenter: Jim Turner, Mathematics & Statistics Department, Calvin College.

Abstract: In the history of ideas, our view of the world as structured mathematically can be traced back to the 17th century rationalists, particularly to Descartes and his relocation of certainty as grounded in the divine mind to certainty as grounded in the personal cogito. In this talk, we will speculate on what the nature of mathematical reasoning would be once the ground of certainty is returned to the divine mind. Here we will follow the thought of the two contemporary 13th century giants of theology: Thomas Aquinas and Bonaventure.

Resources:
- powerpoint slides
- audio recording (.wma)
February 22, 2007

Title: "Naturalism, Nanotechnology, and Our "Post-human" Future: A Reformed Perspective"

Presenter: Charles Adams, Dean of the Natural Sciences and Professor of Engineering, Dordt College; Association of Reformed Institutions of Higher Education (ARIHE) Lecturer, 2006-2008.

Abstract: Advances in technology at the end of the twentieth century have provoked some scholars to predict a future where humans and computers merge to evolve an immortal, post-human "life form" that is free and capable of defining its own "nature." Others react against such "brave new world" scenarios with horror at the prospect of "losing our essential humanity." What does it mean to be human? What are the limitations and the potential of technology with respect to shaping our humanity? This lecture will begin to offer answers to those questions by contrasting a Reformed Christian worldview with the worldviews of naturalism and by suggesting how elements of naturalistic worldviews have too often corrupted Christian worldviews on science and technology.

Sponsors: Co-sponsored by Calvin Engineering Department, the Calvin Center for Christian Scholarship, and Seminars in Christian Scholarship.

Resources:
- powerpoint slides
- audio recording (.wma)
February 23, 2007

Title: "Teaching "Technical Courses" from a Christian Perspective: A Reformed Approach to Pedagogy"

Presenter: Charles Adams, Dean of the Natural Sciences and Professor of Engineering, Dordt College; Association of Reformed Institutions of Higher Education (ARIHE) Lecturer, 2006-2008.

Abstract: Christian education in the Reformed tradition claims to bring a distinctive worldview to bear on every subject in the curriculum. Yet Christian teachers struggle to "teach Christianly" in areas such as the natural sciences, mathematics, and technology. How does a Christian teacher avoid the near hypocritical practice of simply "sprinkling" prayer or a few Bible verses onto an otherwise secularist curriculum or lesson plan in order to call it "Christian?" This lecture will suggest how teaching (mathematics, natural science, or any subject that might be called "technical") from a Christian perspective ought to and can be distinguished from the kind of teaching that occurs in a secular environment.

Sponsors: Co-sponsored by Calvin Engineering Department, the Calvin Center for Christian Scholarship, and Seminars in Christian Scholarship.

Resources:
- powerpoint slides
- audio recording (.mp3)
February 24, 2007*

Title: "Body, Mind, and Spirit: Emerging Perspectives in Science and Religion." (Keynote lecture of the Grand Dialogue in Science and Religion Annual Conference at Grand Valley State University)

Presenters: Philip Clayton, Ingraham Professor of Theology at Claremont School of Theology; Professor of Religion and Philosophy at Claremont Graduate University

March 27, 2007*

Title: "Scripture, God and Time"*

Presenter: Brian Leftow, Professor, Oxford University

Co-sponsor: Calvin Philosophy Department: 2007 Jellema Lectures

March 28, 2007*

Title: "Creation ex Nihilo"*

Presenter: Brian Leftow, Professor, Oxford University

Sponsor: Calvin Philosophy Department: 2007 Jellema Lectures

April 20, 2007*

Title: "Public health issues surrounding factory farms."*

Presenter: Michael Greger, M.D., physician, Director of Public Health and Animal Agriculture at The Humane Society of the United States

Sponsors: Farms Without Harm, in conjunction with the Calvin College Philosophy and Biology Departments

Christian Perspectives in Science Seminar Archives

September 6, 2019

October 18, 2019

October 25, 2019

October 18, 2019

November 1, 2019

April 26, 2019

September 21, 2018

September 24, 2018

September 25, 2018

September 28, 2018

October 3, 2018

October 4, 2018

October 26, 2018

November 9, 2018

November 30, 2018

March 2, 2018

March 9, 2018

April 6, 2018

October 6, 2017

October 13, 2017

October 13, 2017

October 27, 2017

December 1, 2017

February 6, 2017

March 10, 2017

April 7, 2017

April 7, 2017

April 28, 2017, 2017

May 5, 2017, 2017

September 16, 2016

September 30, 2016

October 7, 2016

November 4, 2016

November 18, 2016

December 2, 2016

March 4, 2016

March 7, 2016

March 4, 2016

April 29, 2016

May 6, 2016

October 30, 2015

November 13, 2015

November 20, 2015

December 4, 2015

February 6, 2015

February 13, 2015

February 27, 2015

April 23, 2015

April 24, 2015

May 8, 2015

September 19, 2014

October 3, 2014

October 10, 2014

October 30, 2014

November 7, 2014

November 14, 2014

February 21, 2014

March 7, 2014

March 14, 2014

March 14, 2014

April 3, 2014

April 4, 2014

April 4, 2014

April 4, 2014

April 14, 2014

April 4, 2014

May 9, 2014, 2014

November 1, 2013, 2013

February 8, 2014

February 15, 2014

March 1, 2013

April 5, 2013

April 13, 2013

April 13, 2013

September 6, 2012

October 7, 2012

October 14, 2012

October 28, 2012

February 17, 2012